As utilities adapt to a grid that is increasingly decentralized, digital, and dynamic, the need for better visibility into asset performance has become non-negotiable. The era of scheduled inspections and reactive maintenance is ending, and continuous monitoring is emerging as the new standard for ensuring reliability, safety, and operational efficiency.
Not all monitoring systems are created equal.
Selecting the right solution isn’t just a technical decision, it’s a strategic one. With capital budgets under pressure, a shortage of skilled personnel, and regulatory expectations increasing, utility leaders must ensure their investment in monitoring technology aligns with long-term organizational goals.
Here’s what utility executives, asset managers, and operations leaders should consider when choosing the right monitoring system for their substation, transmission, distribution, or BESS infrastructure.
1. Define the Business Problem First
Before exploring features or comparing vendors, utilities must clarify the business problem they’re trying to solve. Is the goal to reduce maintenance costs? Improve grid reliability? Enhance safety? Extend asset life? Meet regulatory compliance?
Without a clear objective, monitoring deployments often result in fragmented efforts and underutilized systems.
- Start with strategic goals, not technical specs. Align the system’s purpose with measurable KPIs that support enterprise-level outcomes, such as O&M cost reduction, SAIDI/SAIFI improvement, or avoided capital expenditure.
- Involve stakeholders early. Engage engineering, operations, IT, and planning teams to ensure alignment and cross-functional adoption of the solution.
2. Prioritize Utility-Grade Performance
Many commercial monitoring products were never designed for the realities of the substation environment. High-voltage areas, extreme temperatures, electromagnetic interference, and remote site locations demand a different class of equipment.
Utility-grade equipment is specialized equipment designed to meet the extreme reliability, performance, and environmental demands of essential infrastructure such as power grids and telecommunications, often exceeding IEEE and IEC standards. Commercial-grade equipment, while more durable than residential products, is built for professional or industrial settings but lacks the rigorous specifications and harsh condition resistance required for utility operations, making it more susceptible to failure in those demanding environments.
- Look for sensors rated for utility deployment, not commercial or industrial applications. Thermal and visual sensors must withstand environmental stressors and operate reliably in the harshest conditions.
- Ensure substation hardening. The system should be rated for EMI, ESD, voltage surges, temperature fluctuations, and outdoor exposure. These aren't optional, they’re essential for grid resilience.
3. Focus on Integration and Interoperability
The best monitoring system is the one that works with your existing infrastructure, not against it. Many utilities already have SCADA, APM, GIS, and cybersecurity protocols in place. A monitoring platform should complement these systems, not compete with or isolate them.
- Verify compatibility with SCADA and asset management platforms. The ability to push alerts, images, and data into familiar dashboards improves visibility and shortens response times.
- Support for open protocols is essential. Avoid vendor lock-in by selecting systems that use standard communication formats and flexible architectures that scale across the enterprise.
4. Balance Local Intelligence with Cloud Scalability
Utilities face a wide range of connectivity and bandwidth conditions across their networks, from high-speed fibre in urban substations to satellite uplinks in rural areas. The right monitoring system should provide flexibility in how data is processed and transmitted.
- Choose edge-capable systems. Solutions like SWI’s DVS3000 and IM500 perform local processing to reduce latency, improve bandwidth efficiency, and ensure continued operation, even when the network is down.
- Cloud capabilities offer scalability. Cloud-based visualization platforms provide a unified view across all monitored sites, allowing remote teams to assess conditions, diagnose issues, and coordinate responses efficiently.
5. Optimize for Condition-Based Maintenance
Monitoring is not just about visibility, it’s about enabling smarter operations. The right solution should move your organization away from time-based maintenance toward a Condition-Based Maintenance (CBM) model.
- Thermal sensors detect early-stage failures. Temperature anomalies often occur well before visible damage or operational alarms, offering an early warning system that prevents costly downtime.
- Visual sensors provide situational awareness. Operators can remotely inspect gauges, verify switch positions, assess for wildlife interference or flooding, and avoid unnecessary site visits.
- Automated alarms help prioritize action. When rule thresholds are exceeded, alerts should be sent automatically, allowing the O&M team to make informed decisions and dispatch crews only when needed.
6. Don’t Overlook Cybersecurity
As monitoring systems become more connected, they also become more vulnerable. Utilities must treat cybersecurity as a foundational requirement, not an afterthought.
- Insist on network segregation and access controls. Monitoring systems should be isolated from corporate IT networks and secured with user authentication, role-based access, and data encryption.
- Regular patching and firmware updates are essential. A secure system requires ongoing support and maintenance to address emerging threats and vulnerabilities.
7. Consider the Total Lifecycle Cost
The true cost of a monitoring system isn’t just in the hardware, it’s in the deployment, configuration, training, maintenance, and integration over time.
- Evaluate ease of deployment and support. Can the system be installed with minimal disruption? Does it require special tools or personnel? Are professional services available for commissioning and training?
- Look for flexibility in power and networking. Options such as Power over Ethernet (PoE), solar panels, cellular modems, and Wi-Fi connectivity reduce installation time and adapt to a wider range of site conditions.
- Choose a solution that scales. A monitoring system should be modular, allowing you to start small and expand as needs evolve, without duplicating costs or retraining teams.
A Strategic Investment in Grid Intelligence
The right monitoring system isn’t just about technology, it’s about transforming how utilities manage infrastructure in a complex, rapidly evolving environment. Whether the goal is to reduce downtime, strengthen safety, or enable predictive maintenance, monitoring systems must be purpose-built, utility-hardened, and aligned with strategic priorities.
At Systems With Intelligence, we help utilities deploy Touchless™ Monitoring solutions that deliver actionable data where it matters most, at the asset. With proven experience across substations, BESS facilities, and transmission networks, we provide the tools, expertise, and support to help you choose a monitoring system that performs today and scales for tomorrow.
Choosing the right monitoring system is a strategic decision. Let’s help you get it right.
Book a live demo to see how Touchless™ Monitoring from SWI delivers utility-grade performance, real-time data, and seamless integration for your operations.